After San Mateo County District Attorney’s Investigation Deputy Carlos Tapia was Found Not Guilty of Any Criminal Conduct and Should Not Have Been Arrested by the Sheriff’s Office

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

PRESS RELEASE. From San Mateo County District Attorney, Stephen M. Wagstaffe.

On Tuesday afternoon, November 12, 2024 the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office conducted a warrantless arrest of Deputy Carlos Tapia for felony charges of timecard fraud in violation of Penal Code sections 487(A) grand theft and 532(A) obtaining money by false pretenses, occurring between January 1, 2024 and October 18, 2024. The Sheriff’s Office submitted the case to the District Attorney’s Office for review and prosecution the next morning, Wednesday, November 13, 2024. This was the first time
the case was submitted to the District Attorney’s Office for review.

Over the course of the following month the District Attorney’s Office conducted a thorough and detailed investigation into the allegations. We have concluded based on the follow-up investigation that no crime was committed by Deputy Carlos Tapia, that the complete investigation showed that there was no basis to believe any violation of law had occurred, and finally that Deputy Tapia should not have been arrested.

The Sheriff’s Office investigation was conducted entirely by an assigned Acting Assistant Sheriff who reviewed timecard records for Deputy Tapia. The Acting Assistant Sheriff’s investigation was extraordinarily limited and did not involve necessary follow-up investigation to examine the accuracy of the allegations. The Acting Assistant Sheriff noted in his report that the investigation was on-going and more needed to be done. Nevertheless, the Assistant Sheriff reported that the Sheriff’s Office executive leadership directed that Deputy Tapia be arrested on November 12, 2024 without that additional
investigation being conducted.

After the Assistant Sheriff submitted the case for prosecution on November 13, 2024, District Attorney’s Office investigators proceeded over the next month to conduct the complete investigation. This included interviews of the investigating Acting Assistant Sheriff, of the Sergeants and Lieutenant who supervised Deputy Tapia and verified his work schedule and work assignments, Human Resources Management Analysts who verified the MOU rules allowing Deputy Tapia release time for his Deputy Sheriff’s Association work, the Assistant County Controller regarding payroll rules, the Sheriff’s Office Director of Finance and payroll coordinators, and County Public Works staff regarding building log-ins and log-outs. Additionally, a full interview of Deputy Carlos Tapia himself was conducted. Documentary evidence was collected to corroborate verbal statements and interviews were recorded.

At the conclusion of the interview of the investigating Acting Assistant Sheriff, District Attorney investigators discussed with the Acting Assistant Sheriff the additional information learned during the course of the District Attorney’s Office follow-up investigation. The Acting Assistant Sheriff repeated several times that the follow-up investigation definitively established that there is no case against Deputy Tapia and he is not guilty of any criminal conduct.

It is my conclusion that the evidence establishes without question that Deputy Carlos Tapia did not commit grand theft, theft by false pretenses or any sort of timecard fraud. There were clerical errors in the manner in which work hours were coded but nothing showing criminal intent or criminal conduct. Additionally there was no monetary loss to the Sheriff’s Office by the miscoding. Therefore, we deem this matter closed.


More on San Mateo County’s Sheriff on Coastside Buzz

San Mateo County BOS Adopt Ordinance for Special Election to Amend County Charter to Remove Sheriff Corpus with Invite to Next Meeting with Attorneys Prior to Election Deadline;

San Mateo County Independent Civilian Advisory Commission on the Sheriff’s Office Holds Special Meeting to Review Judge Cordell’s Report on Sheriff Christina Corpus;

San Mateo County Supervisors Advance Charter Amendment to Ask Voters for Power to Remove Sheriff;

San Mateo County Supervisors Demand Sheriff’s Immediate Resignation, Terminate Executive Director of Administration Position;

San Mateo County Supervisors to Consider Seeking Sheriff’s Immediate Resignation over Findings from Independent Investigation;


2024 Election

The 2024 Board of Supervisors, from left: Ray Mueller (D3), Noelia Corzo (D2), Warren Slocum (D4, BOS President), David J. Canepa (D5, BOS Vice President) and Dave Pine (D1, outgoing BOS President).

Coastside Buzz
Author: Coastside Buzz

Me

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *