Pro Per Lawsuit Presses Calaveras Reservoir to OPEN Using Mack Test for Boating Pleasure; Crystal Springs Next?

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

OWN WORDS TRIAL BRIEF. From Tim Dummer.

I had a trial date Friday, August 13th, 2021 against the City of San Francisco and the SFPUC (San Francisco Public Utilities Commission) regarding the opening of Calaveras Reservoir to the public, after over 100 years of it being closed.
The 13th was continued to November 19th, 2021.

Calaveras agreed to open it, but for 2 years have done nothing.

I took this suit *pro per because, believe it or not, I could find zero lawyers willing to go against the SFPUC, though they all agreed it was a meritorious suit.

Please see my trial brief below.

The case is solid and devastating to the SFPUC’s argument that the reservoirs (Calaveras and subsequently Crystal Springs and Hetch Hetchy) aren’t navigable (they incorrectly rely on the outdated federal test), and that the County ‘owns’ the property.

In reality the reservoirs are navigable under the binding California Mack test, and the County as a political subdivision of the State does not ‘own’ anything, rather they merely hold it in trust.

I will be filing a similar suit to open Crystal Springs reservoir and the surrounding land very soon.

If you know any attorneys interested in this subject, please send them my way!!

*The term “pro per” is an abbreviation of the Latin phrase “in propria persona,” meaning “in their own person,” and it refers to a situation where a litigant represents themselves, without a lawyer. Pro per is synonymous with the more commonly used term pro se.

Thanks, Tim Dummer, 616.633.6778, email [email protected]

 


Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda

Case: HG19041020
PETITIONER TIMOTHY J.
DUMMER’S TRIAL BRIEF

Hearing Date: August 13, 2021
Hearing Judge: Honorable Frank Roesch
Time: 2:00 p.m.
Place: Dept. 17
Date Action Filed: October 18, 2019

Timothy James Dummer
Petitioner.
vs.
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission,
City and County of San Francisco, Department
of Water Resources, State Water Resources
Control Board, Department of Fish and
Wildlife, the State of California, Alameda
County Sheriff’s Office, Santa Clara County
Sheriff’s Office.
Respondents.

 

Full Trial Brief

This case seeks to compel Respondents (“City”) to simply comply with well-settled
California law and open the Calaveras Reservoir to the public for fishing and recreation.
Petitioner (“Dummer”) asks this court to answer the question, how long may the City continue
violating the law and the California Constitution? California Trout, Inc. v. Superior Court, 218
Cal.App.3d 187, 203 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990) answered a similar question about Fish and Game Code (“FGC”) Sec. 5946, a sister statute to Sec. 5943 involved here.

“The court cannot ignore the ongoing violation of a statutory mandate on the ground that the violation will eventually be halted by untimely administrative action.”

[pdf-embedder url=”https://www.coastsidebuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Calaveras-Trial-Brief.pdf” title=”Calaveras Trial Brief”]

 


 

ESSAY/PODCAST.

RISE OF THE FISHERMEN

The Raker Act of Crystal Springs ~ Part 6

From Open the S.F. Watershed website, written and curated by Andy Howse.

 

Coastside Buzz
Author: Coastside Buzz

Me

One thought on “Pro Per Lawsuit Presses Calaveras Reservoir to OPEN Using Mack Test for Boating Pleasure; Crystal Springs Next?

Comments are closed.