A Sad “State” of Affairs

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

OWN VOICE. ~ InPerspective by Gregg Dieguez —

So where do we stand on COVID-19 vaccinations in our ‘First World’ County and State?  Trigger Warning: contains graphic information of disturbing incompetence.  UPDATE: this article has been updated with description of a Trump Admin. campaign to deny state governments any extra funding for the Covid-19 vaccine rollout last fall.

Images: most will enlarge for improved readability in a new window when you click on them.

One of my neighbors is an intelligent Texan, which, regional rivalry being what it is, has led to some interesting conversations. Recently he tweaked me about how badly California was rolling out its vaccines, which led me to some comparative research about where “we” stand, where “we” is San Mateo County (SMC), California, and the U.S.

I haven’t gotten my vaccine yet, but I know over a dozen people with similar age and medical characteristics who have and/or are scheduled to get it by Feb. 12th. Where? Stanford in Palo Alto. Or in the East Bay. [EDIT: And now UCSF] When I last looked at vaccinateca.com there was only one vaccination site in the County: Kaiser, an HMO where you have to be a member. Then yesterday, the County announced it will vaccinate at the old fairground site – but AFAICT they don’t have any doses for normal folks, yet.  If Santa Clara and other counties can vaccinate people with lesser health risks than I have, why can’t SMC?
SMC Public Health Officer Scott Morrow’s Jan. 19th statement:  is an honest post, reflecting a valid frustration with the lack of supply and the confusion about supply. He doesn’t fully understand where we are, why we are where we are, or when he’s going to know where we are. It’s clear that levels of government above him, especially at the Federal level until Jan. 21st, were in denial, mismanaged, inconsistent, and possibly corrupt. And our state has its own problems with data management and supply as well.  Per Morrow:
“The current supply coming to the various entities in the county from the state appears to be about one tenth [the rate required to vaccinate all by July].”

While there are some excellent philosophical insights in his post, what he DOESN’T describe is what steps he’s taking to resolve the problems.  And HE’S our man in charge.

Vaccination Sites in Vermont 1/30/21

While our public health officer doesn’t seem to know, there are some objective ways to assess how we are doing in San Mateo County. By chance, I had interviews with two professionals from Vermont Friday. One is the managing partner of a large senior living facility in Burlington. “How many COVID cases have you had to date? NONE” (I know something about the quality of management there, and it is excellent). Then a conversation with a nationally known Vt. pediatrician: “How many vaccination sites are there in Vermont? FIFTY-FIVE.” Now let’s put that in context. Vermont is a state, but their population is about about 20% LESS than SMC [chart below]. But 55 vaccination sites in 38 cities compared to 1 or 2 here!? – that’s just astoundingly troubling. The chart shows some other comparisons: our county has a higher death rate and a higher current rate of positive tests, by about DOUBLE the state of Vermont.  As a state, they’ve vaccinated more than double the proportion of their population than California has.

Comparison of our County and State

As my Texan neighbor pointed out (as did others on NextDoor) a few days back, Calif. was 49th in percent of the vaccine received that had been given (administered). We were ahead of only Alabama a week ago, then we fell to 50th. At the time, Texas was 6th. Very recently, California has risen to 42nd… Yoo Hoo! We’ve administered 54.6% of the vaccines. Vermont? 15th at 63.7%. Texas has fallen to 22nd but still 60.7%. Expect these rankings to change daily, and you can track vaccine administration performance HERE.  But we’re doing a well-below average job in SMC and California with a supposedly ‘first world’ economy.

On Wednesday night I learned of two County websites [https://www.smchealth.org/covid-19-vaccination and https://myturn.ca.gov/ .] where you can sign up to get notified when it’s your turn. By 7:30pm Wednesday I had signed up for both. On Saturday, at 12:43pm, I received confirmation that I was registered for the service. Not “your vaccination can now be scheduled”, but 2 days, 17 hours and 13 minutes of latency to say merely “We heard you want a vaccine”.   Of course, as the Supervisor’s report noted: “This notification system is an interim strategy as the State assembles a statewide COVID-19 notification system called MyTurn, which is scheduled to launch later in February and has been posted now as a pilot site: https://myturn.ca.gov/ .”  Which begs the question: if Vermont can have 55 sites established in 38 cities ALREADY, and is 20% smaller in population, what is wrong with California and SMC, supposed leaders in technology and commerce?  Why are we STILL waiting for a system whose need should have been forseen about a year ago?

Finally, one wonders why almost 100% of the vaccine hasn’t been administered. One would think there would be waiting lines as the vials come off the trucks.  Certainly there are supply chain issues involving trucking the deliveries to medical facilities, but there’s no escaping the above comparative measures of failure. Further, one wonders what we’re getting for our taxes here in SMC? We have among the most expensive cost of living in the country and we can’t establish vaccination sites anywhere close to Vermont?!?   Recent reports are that Calif. isn’t properly counting illness at the workplace, which of course, hampers real understanding and control of community spread.   And our state, supposedly a marvel of invention and industry, as well as high-cost, lags well behind the rest of the county in the most important health care job (vaccination) it’s had in 100 years!?!?

Deaths Avoided if we had other country’s death rate…

We’re all aware how the lack of leadership and competence at the federal level led to hundreds of thousands of deaths that could have been avoided with ‘first world’ management such as exists in all the other countries shown [chart at right].  And what is criminal is that the U.S. USED TO BE the preeminent country in pandemic preparedness.  But the level of performance we’re seeing in the U.S., California and San Mateo County appears atrocious, and potentially criminal in the sense of mass manslaughter. Just as we need a Coronavirus Commission at the national level, we need an independent evaluation (i.e. one NOT conducted by our elected officials – a Special Counsel and/or a Grand Jury) at our state and county levels. At this point the only clear conclusion one can reach is that we’re performing terribly; causes, solutions, and firings or prosecutions to follow.

UPDATE 1/31/21: Trump officials actively lobbied to deny states money for vaccine rollout last fall.  So, add this into the list of Federal and State problems:

“Top Trump officials actively lobbied Congress to deny state governments any extra funding for the Covid-19 vaccine rollout last fall — despite frantic warnings from state officials that they didn’t have the money they needed to ramp up a massive vaccination operation.

The push, described to STAT by congressional aides in both parties and openly acknowledged by one of the Trump officials, came from multiple high-ranking Trump health officials in repeated meetings with legislators.”


More From Gregg Dieguez ~ InPerspective

Mr. Dieguez is a native San Franciscan, longtime San Mateo County resident, and semi-retired entrepreneur who causes occasional controversy on the Coastside. He is a member of the MCC, but his opinions here are his own, and not those of the Council. In 2003 he co-founded MIT’s Clean Tech Program here in NorCal, which became MIT’s largest alumni speaker program. He lives in Montara. He loves a productive dialog in search of shared understanding.

Gregg
Author: Gregg

2 thoughts on “A Sad “State” of Affairs

  1. While I would never defend in any way the handling of the covid crisis, I have enjoyed the UCSF Grand Rounds where they address issues around covid testing and vaccination and this past session they explained how vaccination numbers are affected by a backlog of reporting, as reporting is less a priority than the other challenges in the vaccination logistics — they seemed to think that in CA more are being vaccinated than reported.

  2. What’s the obsession with being Covid vaccinated to begin with? Perhaps Gregg would benefit from the “new” Covid 19 test “technique of bung swabbing” now coming out of China.. might help clear his thinking..

Comments are closed.